Skip to content

Menu

HomeAboutServicesContactResources
By: Samuel J. Turco Jr.

Nebraska Debt & Bankruptcy Blog

Published by
Samuel J. Turco Jr.

Contracts? We Don’t Need No Stinking Contracts!

By Sam Turco on January 3, 2014
Posted in Debt Settlement

Stinking Badges.png

I sued you, you didn’t file an answer,

and you didn’t come to court.

What more do I need to prove?

 –Remark made by an attorney for a junk-debt buyer.*

Junk debt is a debt that is sold by creditors at a deep discount with very little or no documentation of the original contract, no record of the payments and finance charges, and no records of the debt assignments.   In many cases the consumer owes no debt at all, and in most cases the consumer does not owe the interest, late fees, and legal fees demanded.

The shocking truth of credit card lawsuits is that it is nearly impossible for the plaintiff to provide a complete copy of the credit card agreement.  This is contrary to almost every other type of loan agreement.  Gosh, banks always keep a copy of the loan agreement, but when it comes to credit cards the banks make so many different offers to so many different people at so many different times that . . . well . . . it is hard to keep track of all those agreements.   

As a result of all the promotional offers and interest rate pricing, determining the actual agreement between the bank and its customer requires an examination of multiple documents.  And therein lies the problem for debt-buyer plaintiffs.  It is almost impossible for the bank, let alone a debt buyer, to produce a complete and coherent set of contract documents necessary to prove what the customer actually owes.

In an effort to avoid this legal hurdle, debt-buyers increasingly sue under the legal theory of “Account Stated.”  In short, you were mailed the credit card statements, and you didn’t object to the statements, so you must owe the amount stated. 

May a credit card company sue on the legal theory of Account Stated when an express written contract exists?  And what’s more, even if a suit can be sustained under this legal theory, isn’t proof of the terms of the written contract necessary to prove that the account is accurately stated?  If my credit card agreement provides for a fixed interest rate of 9.9% and I overlook the fact that I was charged 19.9% on the billing statement, am I obligated to pay 19.9% because I failed to object to the billing statement?

According to Texas attorney Jessica Lesser, author of How to Defend a Credit Card Case, courts should not extend the Account Stated cause of action to a credit card lawsuit since “modern credit card arrangements are invariably creatures of express contract in which the rights and responsibilities of the parties are specified in great detail.”  To the contrary, Lesser argues that there is a great danger in allowing creditors who have not kept good records to substitute their frequently inaccurate billing records for their contracts. 

Is it really asking too much for a bank to keep a copy of their contracts?  Does that really impose too much of a burden on credit card companies or their debt buyers?  And if we deny debtors the right to inspect the terms of their contract when sued in court, haven’t we taken away their basic contract rights? 

There is no ruling in Nebraska on whether credit card companies or junk-debt buyers may avoid producing a copy of their contract when litigating under the Account Stated doctrine, but I suspect it is only time before this issue reaches the appellate courts.  It would seem strange and unjust to allow sloppiness in record keeping to work to the advantage of the credit card industry.  

*Defending Junk-Debt-Buyer Lawsuits by Professor Peter A. Holland, Maryland School of Law

Tags: Account Stated, Credit Cards, Debt Settlement
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Sam Turco Sam Turco

I was born and raised in Omaha, Nebraska, the 3rd of six children.  We grew up in the meat packing district of South Omaha.  I graduated from Omaha Central High School 1985.

 My wife, Kathy, and I are raising 3 children.   Outside of…

I was born and raised in Omaha, Nebraska, the 3rd of six children.  We grew up in the meat packing district of South Omaha.  I graduated from Omaha Central High School 1985.

 My wife, Kathy, and I are raising 3 children.   Outside of work, I spend a lot of time escorting children to sporting events while trying to sneak in a long bicycle ride on the weekends.

Areas of Practice
  • 100% Bankruptcy Law
Litigation Percentage
  • 5% of Practice Devoted to Litigation
Bar Admissions
  • Nebraska, 1992
  • Iowa
  • U.S. District Court District of Nebraska, 2010
  • U.S. Tax Court
Read more about Sam TurcoSam's Linkedin ProfileSam's Twitter ProfileSam's Facebook Profile
Show more Show less
Related Posts
11415401116_54bdfd6d34
Reinventing Credit Counseling
March 12, 2021
Choices
Chapter 7: The 99% Solution
November 17, 2015
Help
Is there such a thing as getting help to avoid bankruptcy?
September 18, 2015

About Us

Samuel Turco is a native Nebraskan whose wealth of knowledge and experience in bankruptcy law, along with a rich understanding of the issues faced by those in all corners of the state, has been instrumental in building a bankruptcy law practice adept in always seeing things from the client’s perspective.

Read More....

Stay Connected

Subscribe via RSS Subscribe via RSS

Topics

Archives

Recent Posts

  • How to Fill Out the Lawsuit Answer Form
  • Make them Produce Documents
  • Interrogatories: Make Them Answer Questions
  • Discovery: What you do after responding to a lawsuit.
  • Are Zillow Home Values Accurate?
Main Office
3006 South 87th Street
Omaha, NE 68124
Phone: (402) 939-6050
Fax: (402) 939-0960
Branch Office
5000 Central Park Drive, Suite 204
Lincoln, NE 68124
Phone: (402) 939-6050
Fax: (402) 939-0960
Subscribe via RSS Subscribe via RSS
Privacy PolicyDisclaimerResources
Copyright © 2023, Sam Turco Law Offices. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo