Skip to content

Menu

HomeAboutServicesContactResources
By: Samuel J. Turco Jr.

Nebraska Debt & Bankruptcy Blog

Published by
Samuel J. Turco Jr.

Court Denies CitiBank Interest When Contract Lost

By Sam Turco on January 24, 2014
Posted in Uncategorized

Spider Web

What happens when a bank cannot produce a copy of their credit card agreement during a lawsuit for an unpaid account balance?  Well, that was exactly the situation when CitiBank sued Teresa Cooper in the Superior Court of Vermont, and that case typifies the current status of credit card lawsuits nationwide.  Banks cannot seem to produce a copy of their contracts when litigating unpaid accounts.

What CitiBank was able to provide the court was a copy of the monthly billing statements mailed to its customer and the bank sought to recover a summary judgment on the legal theory of Account Stated.  In short, the account was stated month to month via the billing statements, no objections were made by the borrower, so the balance must be true.

Amazingly, credit card companies have tremendous difficulties producing a copy of the written contract. This is because the contract is not contained in one document but is a result of several documents, perhaps dozens or hundreds of documents, generated during the time the account exists that must be read together to come up with the terms of the agreement. 

Oh, what a tangled web we weave. When first we practice to deceive!

In an effort to generate higher profits, banks created flexible contract documents that could be amended or supplemented at any time by simply mailing a notice of changes to interest rates, late fees, over-limit fees, cash advance fees, credit score fees, etc.  So, to figure out what the bank should have charged in any one month, dozens or perhaps hundreds of documents must be reviewed to determine what terms applied from one month to the next.  Of course, the problem is that the banks have failed to create a single depository of all these documents unique to each customer, and the banks themselves struggle to produce the full set of contract documents, let alone to explain how the contacts actually operate in a court of law. 

Well, not really a big deal, right?  I mean, you were mailed a statement of the then current contract terms and you didn’t object, so what’s all the fuss?

At least in the State of Vermont, this is a big fuss.  The court stated that in none of their prior cases had they applied the doctrine of Account Stated to a distantly located bank or other financial institution where no personal relationship existed.   The classic example of a running account is between a farmer and the local supply store, but that hardly resembles the modern relationship between a distant bank and its borrowers.  The court found that the borrower did not, unlike the farmer and his supplier, agree to the amount of the debt. 

“Even if there are situation in which this position (failing to contest the accuracy of a bill) may have merit, it is without merit in credit card transactions because it is based on the assumption that the recipient, upon review of an invoice, can readily determine whether this is an amount he or she owes . . .This assumption does not hold true with credit card agreements and transactions.  Credit card statements often contain multiple interest rates, interest rates which fluctuate from billing period to billing period, and a myriad of other kinds of fees and penalties.”

The court further stated that “[w]hile the credit cardholder, looking at the statement, can see the amount of the charges that were imposed, he or she is unlikely to know whether the charges are consistent with the writings governing the cardholders obligations . . . [T]he Court does not agree that Ms. Cooper’s silence was tantamount to assent to the accuracy of the monthly statements.”

The Court does not agree that Ms. Cooper’s silence was tantamount to assent”

In the absence of providing the court with a complete copy of the credit card contract, the court denied all interest and finance charges and limited recovery to the principal borrowed minus the payments made on the account.

The Vermont court nailed the issue:  Silence is not assent.  Failure to protest the accuracy of a credit card statement is not the same thing as agreement to the charges.  Consumers are simply not able to measure the accuracy of the monthly finance charges.  Without producing the credit card agreement  banks should never recover more that the principal amount borrowed.

 

 

 

 

Tags: Account Stated, Contract, Credit Cards, Junk Debt
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Sam Turco Sam Turco

I was born and raised in Omaha, Nebraska, the 3rd of six children.  We grew up in the meat packing district of South Omaha.  I graduated from Omaha Central High School 1985.

 My wife, Kathy, and I are raising 3 children.   Outside of…

I was born and raised in Omaha, Nebraska, the 3rd of six children.  We grew up in the meat packing district of South Omaha.  I graduated from Omaha Central High School 1985.

 My wife, Kathy, and I are raising 3 children.   Outside of work, I spend a lot of time escorting children to sporting events while trying to sneak in a long bicycle ride on the weekends.

Areas of Practice
  • 100% Bankruptcy Law
Litigation Percentage
  • 5% of Practice Devoted to Litigation
Bar Admissions
  • Nebraska, 1992
  • Iowa
  • U.S. District Court District of Nebraska, 2010
  • U.S. Tax Court
Read more about Sam TurcoSam's Linkedin ProfileSam's Twitter ProfileSam's Facebook Profile
Show more Show less

About Us

Samuel Turco is a native Nebraskan whose wealth of knowledge and experience in bankruptcy law, along with a rich understanding of the issues faced by those in all corners of the state, has been instrumental in building a bankruptcy law practice adept in always seeing things from the client’s perspective.

Read More....

Stay Connected

Subscribe via RSS Subscribe via RSS

Topics

Archives

Recent Posts

  • How to Fill Out the Lawsuit Answer Form
  • Make them Produce Documents
  • Interrogatories: Make Them Answer Questions
  • Discovery: What you do after responding to a lawsuit.
  • Are Zillow Home Values Accurate?
Main Office
3006 South 87th Street
Omaha, NE 68124
Phone: (402) 939-6050
Fax: (402) 939-0960
Subscribe via RSS Subscribe via RSS
Privacy PolicyDisclaimerResources
Copyright © 2023, Sam Turco Law Offices. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo